Nicola Sturgeon announces that’ Stay At Home ‘will be released on Jan. April ends when the route map is set for blocking

Senior Conservative MP David Davis has used his parliamentary privilege to read alleged text messages from a high-ranking SNP aid that he describes as a whistleblower

Davis, the former Brexit secretary, read out a series of messages sent to an SNP official relating to the Scottish Parliament’s ongoing investigation into the abuse of complaints against former First Minister Alex Salmond

The move has led the Scottish opposition to urge Nicola Sturgeon to clarify when they knew of complaints against Mr Salmond

So what did Mr. Davis say, did the Scottish Government respond and what is the parliamentary privilege? You need to know that

Davis has been an MP for Haltemprice and Howden since 1997 and serves the Conservative Party in Westminster

He is a former member of the cabinet and held the positions of Foreign Minister for the exit from the European Union from 2016 to 2018

He was also Home Secretary of the Shadows from 2003 to 2008 and was against Tony Blair’s government and Minister for Europe under Prime Minister John Major from 1994 to 1997

He has proven popular with his conservative and bipartisan colleagues when he campaigned against editorial offices for privacy and security

This included leading the opposition on plans to allow police and security services to expand their surveillance of public email and social media communications

On 16 March he stood in the House of Commons reading unpublished evidence from the Salmond inquiry using the parliamentary privilege

In an adjournment debate, Mr Davis read out information he had allegedly received from an SNP whistleblower

He said this contradicts claims made by the chief minister’s chief of staff that she did not know of the investigation into Mr Salmond until April 2018

He claims chief of staff Liz Lloyd interfered in the complaint process against Alex Salmond, and the news showed “a concerted effort by senior members of the SNP to initiate complaints”

Mr. Davis told the House of Commons, “The information consisted of a download of text messages from the phone of Sue Ruddick, the chief operating officer of the SNP

“Now Alex Salmond has claimed that there has been a malicious and concerted attempt to remove me from public life in Scotland

“These are incredibly serious allegations. The whistleblower clearly agrees with these allegations. He or she begins their communication by claiming that the evidence presented, and I quote,” indicates collusion, perjury and even criminal conspiracy “”

Mr. Davis added that “not a single string of texts will provide conclusive evidence of what the whistleblower has termed a” criminal conspiracy “

He accused Liz Lloyd of lying when she took the oath that she knew nothing about allegations in February 2018

Davis continued: “I firmly believe that starting at the age of 6 February 2018 an exchange of messages took place between officers Judith McKinnon and Barbara Alison, suggesting that the chief minister’s chief of staff is interfering in the complaint process against Alex Salmond

“If so, it suggests that the Chief of Staff was aware of the Salmond case in February, not April, as she alleged under oath”

He added that Nicola Sturgeon had committed herself to (a) April date in both parliamentary and legal statements. She was of course aware earlier: the only question is how aware and how much earlier ”

If the allegations turned out to be true and Nicola Sturgeon had not been truthful in her statement to the investigation and parliament, it would mean that she has violated the Ministerial Code – which her critics call a “discharged offense” / p>

This evidence had not been released to the public, but Mr. Davis shared it with his parliamentary ministerial privilege

Salmond had previously asked the Holyrood investigation to seek text and WhatsApp messages between officials, ministers and special advisers or other relevant evidence

However, the texts they received were ultimately not made public because the MSP felt it would not be in the public interest to publish the private communications that they said were “safe rooms for confidential assistance.” are ”

According to the UK Parliament’s website, parliamentary privilege grants members of both houses certain immunities so that they can carry out their duties without outside interference

“Parliamentary privilege includes freedom of expression and the right of both chambers to regulate their own affairs”

This means that MPs and Lords in both Houses of Parliament can disclose information that is not publicly available for reasons such as super-injunctions and civil liability

This does not apply to crimes unrelated to their position as ministers.If they violate civil law for any reason other than the performance of their duty as a civil servant, they can still be arrested and charged

Davis used his privilege to divulge the alleged information on the officials’ messages suggesting that Liz Lloyd intervened in the complaint process against Alex Salmond

The messages contained an email between two tools labeled “Liz interference v bad” sent in February 2018

Davis stressed that he had used his MEP privilege to disclose the information as the Scottish Parliament did not have the same privilege

“We actually gave the Holyrood Inquiry the right to summon but not use evidence. It is because of these shortcomings that I had this debate today,” he said

“We need to strengthen the Scottish Parliament’s ability to hold its own government accountable. I am here to strengthen the Scottish Parliament, not bury it”

Following Davis’s speech, the Prime Minister issued a statement defending her own actions and those of her senior officials

A spokesman for the First Minister said: “As with Mr Salmond’s earlier allegations and cherry-picking messages, the reality is very different from the picture shown

“Every message in which SNP employees are involved has previously been seen by the committee. Their views have been widely reported as dismissive by them”

Commenting on the allegations about her Chief of Staff, the spokeswoman said: “The commentary read by Mr Davis regarding the Chief of Staff did not apply to Ms. A or Ms. B, and at the time she was unaware that there was any connection to the former First Minister gave “

However, Scottish Conservative Leader Douglas Ross urged Sturgeon to confirm or deny allegations that she was aware of complaints against Mr Salmond in February 2018 on the grounds that prior knowledge had been “an outrageous invasion of the privacy and confidentiality of these women” would be

Mr Ross said: “February 2018 is also two months before Nicola Sturgeon originally claimed to be researching complaints.If her chief of staff knew about it at the time and got involved in the investigation, it will blow another huge hole in the history of the First Minister

“If officials said the chief minister’s chief of staff interfered in the investigation, then that is a dismissal It raises serious questions about how she tried to interfere, how she found out, who told her when she knew and who she continued to tell

“It continues to raise the question of whether anyone told Nicola Sturgeon that their chief of staff intervened in the investigation. In this case, the Scottish Parliament was told a number of lies. If they did not, it makes Nicola Sturgeon’s story, when she claims to have heard of complaints, even more implausible

“These are all” if “we need Nicola Sturgeon to immediately confirm or deny these new allegations and to agree to release the evidence cited this week”

The Scottish Parliament’s investigation into complaints of wrongdoing will be concluded in the coming days

David Davis

World News – UK – What David Davis accused the senior official of lying about Salmond Inquiry – what he said