2020 could have been a great year for Prince Andrew, given the global circumstances that have forced his relatives to work from home, but the year the Prince is out due to controversy over his When friendship with late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein withdrew from royal duties, he did not appear to be in the limelight. As much as the palace might prefer to go on

This month the Daily Mail published a four-part investigation by reporters Stephen Wright and Richard Pendlebury comparing the allegations of Epstein victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre and the refusals offered by Andrew and his friends to keep records and reports on the time Andrew spent with Epstein and Maxwell, the series investigates Giuffre’s allegations of sexual assault (which Andrew has denied several times), finds new travelogues and photos, confirms some suspicions, and adds some new supporting characters to the saga

But the investigation can perhaps best be summed up with the journalists’ decision to close with their 10 open questions, five for Andrew and five for Giuffre.Your questions to Andrew’s accusers are primarily factual: about the specifics of their unpublished memoirs or a trip to Epstein’s New Mexico Ranch For Andrew, the questions are more existential “What was the main reason for your long relationship with billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein?” They ask, “Now do you understand why you lack empathy for how Epstein’s victims must feel?”

In other words, we’re back to the beginning.It’s been a little over a year since Andrew’s bizarre statements for his friendship with Epstein brought the royal family into crisis, and while there is no irrefutable evidence that Andrew Was involved in a possible crime there is still no indication that he understands, mere presence is reason to suspect Based on the investigation, we know what dates Andrew may have visited with Epstein and Maxwell, but it does not bring us closer to an explanation – and it makes it even less likely that we’ll ever get one

When Andrew sat for the Newsnight interview with Emily Maitlis that led to global embarrassment, the Q&A focused on one night in particular – Jan. March 2001 when Giuffre said she was with Epstein, Maxwell and Andrew in a London nightclub called Tramp and in Maxwell’s Belgravia townhouse.A photo of Andrew next to Giuffre and Maxwell, reportedly taken in the house by Epstein, first appeared in 2011, began to circulate again the next month after Epstein’s arrest and suicide in July 2019, however. This cast doubt on Andrew’s insistence that he “saw, witnessed, or suspected no conduct of the kind that later led to [Epstein’s] arrest and conviction “As he said in an August 2019 statement in the Newsnight interview, Andrew suggested covering the picture, citing his explicit memories of a birthday party at the Pizza Express in Woking, Surrey, as evidence that he was on that day Couldn’t go to the tramp nightclub

In an attempt to validate Andrew’s provided alibi, part of the Mail investigation fleshed out the story of the day using the household diary at the time he was living with ex-wife Sarah Ferguson at Sunninghill Park in Berkshire, but that weekend was she as part of her job at Wedgwood ceramics company in New York That morning, Princess Beatrice had a lacrosse match and Princess Eugenie played netball for a few hours, as the reporters noted that the birthday party likely included a trip to the theater and took advantage of the running time of the Piece to determine when the part of dinner would have started A source told the newspaper that Beatrice said she did not remember that particular party, they tracked down the family who were hosting the party They said they knew Sarah and Andrew as parents involved, but had no other recall of the party than the one Beatrice was attending

In the mail, the allegations that Giuffre made in a 2019 interview and unpublished memoir are questioned on some points They only make sense if you’ve followed the story closely, however, since Maxwell claimed in a 2016 statement that “the tub was too small for any type of activity,” the Mail made a digital replica of the second floor to do that Understanding layout of townhouse they sought testimony from three former personal companions of Andrew, all of whom said Andrew does not drink alcohol One of them added that he only drinks water at social events March 2001 in the Tramp nightclub, three days later, with a glass of water in hand

Ultimately, the mail concludes that Andrew’s alibi for the night is plausible but not verifiable. Of the four people who were finally able to pinpoint his location, two are dead, one is Maxwell, and the fourth, his housekeeper, can’t remember if he was home that night

The investigation expands its scope to include other trips Andrew took in 2001, and provides further explanation for his connection with Epstein at the time: his obvious pursuit of women in Epstein’s orbit, sources said, according to the Mail, Andrew’s presence in Little in April 2001 St. James, the infamous island, was involved with Gwendolyn Beck, a financier who worked with Epstein On a trip to Epstein’s New Mexico Ranch in November 2000, a source claims Andrew had a relationship with Melanie Walker, a neurosurgeon who is also known as a scientific Was a consultant for Epstein

To cast doubt on Giuffre’s allegation that she went horse riding with Andrew on that trip in 2000, a friend of Andrew raised an interesting objection, “It is known among his family and friends that the Duke had a hay fever allergy that was with him all his life, “the friend told the newspaper.” So he gave up riding as a teenager. The Duchess persuaded him to take an acupuncture regimen later in life, which also dealt with horse hair allergy. “These explanations from friends aim to highlight supposedly innocent motivations underlying his behavior while still leaving room to question his judgment, to even spend time with Epstein.Instead, the righteous stories reiterate the idea that Andrew was more entangled in his world, than we had previously understood

One reason Andrew failed to make an open statement might have to do with concerns about his future. The Times of London has reported on Andrew’s desire to return to the royal ward, despite the Palace insisting it not as simple as reputation management According to The Telegraph, a return to public life is unlikely to be possible until the situation is finally resolved. “When he stepped down from his public role” for the foreseeable future “last November, there was controversy over his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, “a palace insider told the newspaper in October” In an ideal world, the family would love to see things change, but the harsh reality is that there are many hurdles to overcome first “

If journalists and Andrew’s friends and coworkers point out inconsistencies in Giuffre’s report, the story will not be resolved, and at this point it is not clear what will happen.In July, Maxwell will be on trial on six federal cases, including one Conspiracy to induce minors to travel to engage in illegal sexual acts and perjury (She pleaded not guilty and denied the allegations that she helped Epstein) It might be Andrew’s last chance to save his reputation, but until he does can answer the most basic question – why were you friends with Epstein and Maxwell for so long? – there is no great chance that it will ever come out of below the scandal

> Recent Pandemic Capsule – The Queen says goodbye to her beloved Dorgi, Vulcan – Barack Obama on his book, the election and what makes America really great – How we exposed the Hollywood Con Queen suspect – From the archives: Your most loyal ones Subjects, a story of the Queen’s kennels – not a subscriber? Attend Vanity Fair to get full access to VFcom and the full online archive now

© 2020 Condé Nast All rights reserved.By using this website you accept our user agreement (updated on 010121) as well as the data protection guideline and the cookie statement (updated on 010121) and your privacy rights to California Vanity Fair may earn a portion of its sales from products purchased through our website through our partnering partnerships with retailers. The material on this website may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or reproduced without prior written permission from Condé Nast. be cached or otherwise used Ad selection

Prince Andrew

World news – AU – Should we give up hope of a satisfactory solution to the Prince Andrew scandal?

Source: https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2020/12/prince-andrew-scandal-new-investigations